Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Driscoll Street 2028 reconstruction design→At a glance
- Public comments
- 15
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 17, 2026.
Public comments (15)
Spoke during public participation on the Driscoll Street reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →Spoke during public participation on the Driscoll Street reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →A resident of S Driscoll St spoke during public participation on the reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →Spoke during public participation on the Driscoll Street reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →Spoke during public participation on the Driscoll Street reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →Spoke during public participation on the Driscoll Street reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →Spoke during public participation on the Driscoll Street reconstruction design.
Common Council — June 17, 2026 · 0:00 →Did not speak but stated through the chair that he supports the position Dawn Beekler is presenting, opposing the sidewalks and narrowing.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 11:05 →Longtime resident of 1543 S. Driscoll who opposes sidewalks and any narrowing, noting constant backup beeps from trucks and no desire for sidewalks.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 12:02 →With his wife Carissa, opposed sidewalks — their cars overhang their sidewalk pad and they'd face $30,000-$45,000 in driveway and sewer lateral costs.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 13:54 →Co-spoke with her husband Jim; their priority is no sidewalks, which would force them to park in the road nightly.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 13:54 →Advocating for his mother at 1525 S. Driscoll; disputed the parking data, saying 16 cars are common and the cameras should have run longer.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 16:01 →Neighborhood spokesperson presenting the case against the design: 96%+ of 32 properties oppose it, parking and emergency access concerns, financial hardship, and a request to deviate from the complete streets policy for this dead-end street.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 17:30 →Stated she stands with Don Beekler and all of his comments opposing the proposal.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 27:34 →Declined to give her name publicly; urged a no vote, questioned sidewalk costs and width, cited zero crashes since 2017, and noted other sidewalk-less neighborhoods will face this too.
Municipal Services Committee — June 8, 2026 · 27:59 →